The Problem With Getting Civic Info From Social Media

I will be the first to say it: social media can be useful.

Sometimes, it is where people first hear about a bill moving through their state legislature or Congress. Sometimes, it’s where they learn an election is coming up. Sometimes it's when someone explains a court decision or a political issue in a way that finally makes sense.

That part isn’t the problem. The problem is when social media becomes the only place we get civic information.

Too often, what we get on social media isn't the full picture; we’re getting a clip, a caption, a reaction, or a biased take. Sometimes, it’s helpful or thoughtful. Sometimes, it’s even right. However, if there are no receipts attached, we should be careful about treating it as if it’s the whole truth.

A lot of people online are very good at talking, but that doesn’t mean they are always showing their work.

And that matters, especially when we are talking about elections, voting rights, legislation, courts, candidates, and the systems that shape people’s everyday lives. 

Civic information shouldn’t just sound good; it should be traceable! You should be able to see where it came from, what the record says, what the bill actually does, how someone voted, who funded the campaign, what changed between the headline and the final version, and so on.

Then there’s the algorithm….The more you watch one kind of political content, the more of that content you are naturally going to get. That doesn’t mean every video is wrong. It doesn’t mean every creator is dishonest. But it does mean your feed can start shaping what feels normal, urgent, true, or obvious before you realize it’s happening.

That is how bias can creep in. Not always because someone sat down and decided to intentionally mislead you, but because the platform learned what keeps you watching.

And if we are honest, politically charged content is built for that. Outrage travels fast. Fear and certainty travel fast, but nance usually has to fight for its life!

That’s why I don’t think the answer is to tell people to stop using social media. Most of us aren’t going to do that. I use it, too, but we have to collectively and individually stop following it blindly. We have to stop letting the first thing we see become the final thing we believe.

Use social media as a starting point, not the sole source of truth.

If a post tells you a bill is dangerous, go look at the bill. If someone says a candidate supports something, check the record. If a video says an official voted a certain way, look at the vote. If a headline sounds too clean, too perfect, or too outrageous, slow down long enough to ask what may be missing.

That’s the discipline, and that is why we are building Elect Better:

Not to tell people what to think or who to vote for, but to make the receipts easier to find and easier to understand. Whether someone is looking for election information, candidate comparisons, voting records, campaign finance, or plain-English explanations of legislation, the goal is the same: help people get past the noise and closer to the record.

Democracy should not depend on who has the most viral take. 

It should depend on people having access to clear information, reliable records, and tools that help them make decisions with their eyes open.

So yes, watch the video. Read the post. Listen to the commentary. But don’t stop there…

Check the receipts!

That is how we move from reacting to understanding. That’s how we stop letting the algorithm do our civic thinking for us. That is how we build a healthier way for people to participate at every level of government.

Elect Better means checking the record before sharing the reaction.

Join the waitlist at electbetter.us and help us build a civic information platform made for people who want the receipts, not just the noise!

~ Josh, CEO & Co-Founder

Subscribe to this newsletter